this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
1936 points (99.7% liked)

Fediverse

28493 readers
1168 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] necrxfagivs@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

The admins stated on Mastodon that they're not going to defederate until something happens. Knowing Meta they shouldn't give them the chance.

Here's the link: https://mastodon.world/@mwadmin/110654590632768079

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Thats unfortunate. I'll be moving instances then. Giving Meta a chance is a lot like giving a mosquito a chance to not suck your blood.

[–] Squiglet@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Its like that story of the frog helping the scorpion cross the river.

[–] stupidillusion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you move? I signed up through .world but don't want a chance of touching the poo (meta).

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just make a new account with another instance. You get about the same content as before.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sudo@lemmy.fmhy.ml 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"until something happens"

I suppose Metas history of actively being a bad actor working against societies best interests and enabling hate groups doesn't qualify as 'something'...

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

yeah that this point meta just existing is bad

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] trifictional@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh, looks like I’m switching instances.

[–] Trifictional@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] favrion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (13 children)

How do you do that? I'm subscribed to like 50 conmunities. Would I have to start all over? That doesn't sound like it's worth it.

[–] CMahaff@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Just gonna name-drop the tool I made to do this :) https://github.com/CMahaff/lasim

It's only been out a few days, let me know if you have any issues!

[–] 3rdBlueWizard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awesome! I was hoping this would be possible. I plan to host my own instance hobbit.world and would need to migrate everything.

Also, I'll defederate any corporate instances. No need to encourage bad actors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks. I liked .world but no way will I let meta in.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for making this!

[–] gornar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly it isn't. Nothing about the Fediverse is private or inherently secure in that way. Everything is public. And you should assume that everything you publish through activity pub could eventually be looked at by anyone. If you want private or secure messaging there are non-activity pub open source secure alternate. In fact signing up for Lemmy there's even a field to enter for one. Whether or not a server federates with meta. Meta is still going to data mine the ever-loving shit out of all of them. The point is. None of us are at Meta's wim about being flooded with their toxic content.

Honestly I want to see meta flooded with our content. So much anti-threads anti Meta sentiment. Actual leftists. And not just make believe right-wing liberals who've been conditioned to think that they are left. It would be hilarious to watch Meta try to play wack-a-mole sanitizing everything. To please their reptilian corporate overlords. And if you don't care and just don't want to see it. You can always block them personally. Why let them data mine in peace. I say we make them work for it.

[–] hikaru755@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not really about privacy, though. It's about the risk of Meta going "Embrace, extend, extinguish" on the fediverse, and the only way to protect against that is by not letting them interact with the majority of it from the get-go. https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaktor@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not real sure how much the Threads Algorithm is going to pass through Mastodon content (and even less sure if it will even be able to pass through Lemmy content). I think the much more valuable aspect is you can pitch your Threads friends that they can move to the Fediverse and actually get to choose what content they see rather than which influencers paid Meta to fill up your feed.

[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed about influencers. Meta wouldn't be doing this at all if they didn't have a plan (or multiple plans) to monetize it. The whole reason I left Reddit and plan to leave Twitter was that I very much dislike having any part of my online enjoyment at the mercy of the whims of gigantic corporate assholes that think they are far more important than they are. Meta has been an awful and abusive actor in the tech world, why would any freedom-loving person want anything to do with them in a freedom-loving space?! Why would anyone just wait and see what they do this time to decide they're an awful company with only their profits in mind and no qualms about making those profits at a cost to its users?!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gamers_Mate@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh damn guess I will migrate to lemmy.ml and use that until I find out if lemmy.world defederates or not. (Edit turns out it is run by tankies and they are federated with lemmygrad.) While I may or may not stay on lemmy.world depending on if we federate with meta or not. I will no longer suggest Lemmy.ml.

[–] necrxfagivs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not in a hurry to migrate, as Threads doesn't support federation yet, but is not a bad idea to keep an eye on other instances.

[–] Shikadi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bloody hell, I literally just switched to Lemmy.world, do I really need to switch to Lemmy.ml? Come on guys

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gornar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Tolerance paradox applies here too

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

until something happens

What exact behaviors are they looking for that would cause them to push the block button?

Threads can do very well for themselves without the fediverse as they are already demonstrating. What real motive do they have to join the fediverse except to shut it down?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I want to be on an instance that defederates, I will move if world does not do it.

[–] antik@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The discussion is still on-going.

[–] Squiglet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What is there to discuss?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tox_solid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)