this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1434 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45537 readers
219 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cyberwitch_7493@lemmy.dbzer0.com 153 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's kinda like comparing universal healthcare to individual payer for-profit insurance. One rewards everyone as a universal system with consistency (at least in theory) and the other rewards only rich people.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. One's a business and one's a service the government provides.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The government provides

Except USPS is completely self funded, and does NOT use any of your tax dollars.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's an excellent point, but it is still a government service.

Being administered by the government, self sufficient, and mandated to not make excess revenue just makes it a remarkably easy to justify service.

[–] wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s nothing inherently stopping us from crowdfunding services with a similar “business model” separate from the government. Can’t wait for that light bulb to flicker on for most of us.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually live in a city where the public works is a publicly owned utility, and it's pretty great. Rates are reasonable, excess revenue goes to infrastructure improvements rather than shareholders, and leadership is paid reasonably ($300k+benefits for CEO equivalent), and key decisions are voted on by the city council.

I'm curious why you want something separate from the government. To me, a crowd funded publicly controlled service is a government service in all but name and accountability.

[–] wtfeweguys@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The city/state level is much more likely to achieve things like this and that’s great but it’s not always the case. Regulatory capture and complex relationships with industry players make the government an imperfect vehicle for doing what’s best for communities. Sometimes a downright impediment to it.

My point is that there’s nothing inherently stopping us from doing it for ourselves in any situation where the state is not optimally stewarding the public trust on our behalf, and the sooner we figure that out the sooner we start solving up-til-now rather intractable problems.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I suppose my point was more that publicly owned funded and managed is functionally what government is.
Any issues with government management of a utility is just as applicable to a crowd funded publicly managed one.

There's nothing stopping us from altering the state to optimally steward the public trust. It's probably easier because the state already exists, and has mechanics for dealing with the types of civil issues that arise from community organization on complex projects.

The government isn't something that's apart from us, it's made of us.

What, to you, is the actual difference between a community working together and organizing their resources for the common benefit, and a government?

Sorry for the delayed reply. Been AFK.

What, to you, is the actual difference between a community working together and organizing their resources for the common benefit, and a government?

The ability to collaborate solely with values-aligned community rather than being forced to reach consensus across all people in a geographic region regardless of how antagonistic or philosophically misaligned we are.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why they oppose universal healthcare here in the US -- they wan't access to special treatment.

What they don't realize is they can still have Mommy's Super Special Boy(tm) access, since even in a system of universal healthcare, there's still a demand for private practice.

So really, it just boils down to them hating poor people and other marginalized groups

[–] bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

Also universal healthcare can afford specialized equipment because the amount of people they would service is higher than the profit driven hospital

Rather than the current system of specialized equipment still having to make profit so treatment costs increase

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would argue that a postal service is not structured the same way as an on demand service like uber.

A postal courier who arrives at your door, picks up an important document, and takes it straight to the recipient will cost about the same.

When you write a letter or send a parcel you first take it to a designated pick up point. It is then picked up at an allocated time along with all the other letters and parcels, and at best it is going to arrive the next day having been through a huge sorting routing system at the post depot.

Apples and oranges.

Also fuck uber eats and the gig economy.

[–] Cyberwitch_7493@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk, I got a care package in the mail with a cake inside, seems like they can both deliver food lol. 🤷

Also the cake is delicious, and yeah fuck the gig economy.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did the cake arrive in half an hour? I mean, would they be able to deliver a hot meal because you suddenly decided you couldn't be bothered to cook that evening.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You can actually just put the letter in your mailbox. You don't have to take it to a dropoff.

If you're willing to drop it off, they also do same day for $4 for packages under 5 lbs inside a local region. They'll pick it up and drop it off just about anywhere in the country next day for basically the same cost.

Your point stands, but the USPS is a logistical wonder.

I’m an Uber driver and it’s a godsend of flexibility and decent, consistent income for me but I’d be so much happier with a collectively-owned alternative that charges less and passes more of the ride fare onto the drivers.

[–] prayer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Except you would be very upset if your Uber eats took 3-5 days to arrive, as a postal system does. The cost is because it's an entirely different product, an on-demand courier system. It's closer to comparing universal healthcare with having a doctor on retainer (if such a thing exists).