this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
74 points (97.4% liked)

Games

16471 readers
646 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
74
Blizzard bans 250,000 Overwatch 2 cheaters, says its AI that analyses voice chat is warning naughty players and can often 'correct negative behaviour immediately' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh sure there's definitely bias in AI, same as selfdriving cars. They make mistakes, but make far fewer than humans.

[–] Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but the mistakes aren't the main issue, it's that AI is just a tool that by extention can be abused by the humans in control. You have no idea what rules they give it and what false positives result from it.

My primary concern here is that it's Blizzard, whom love to gargle honey for China and is all for banning players that speak against them, is in charge of this AI.

Blizzard's previously talked about using AI to verify reports of disruptive voice chat, which is now running in most regions, though not globally. The developer says it has seen this technology "correct negative behavior immediately, with many players improving their disruptive behavior after their first warning."

Great, they can auto-ban players like Ng Wai Chung, I guess. For whatever they subjectively deem 'harmful'. There's also the looming idea that a friend can wander in my room, say something dumb, and now I'm closer to a ban because of an unrelated choice I made outside the game.

And we definitely trust Blizard to be good with all the audio data they get to harvest. That won't be abused later, right?

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I mean that's a general argument against technology. Yes, more technology means more ruthlessly efficient abuse, but ultimately you think technology is better in the long run or not. Either way it is inevitable. Maybe in the EU they will ban those abuses, in China they won't, and US will find some weird compromise between the two.