this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
435 points (96.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20846 readers
2314 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] radix@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why would you ~~pipe~~ edit: redirect neofetch into your .bashrc?

[–] lco@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so that everytime you launch a terminal, your neofetch data is displayed. Because wow, neofetch!!!

It doesn't really make sense, since the data would be outdated anyway if piped into .bashrc that way...

[–] radix@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago

But .bashrc is executed, not displayed.

Maybe they meant to say echo neofetch >> ~/.bashrc.

[–] raubarno@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It won't work. It's a dangerous command because a single > destroys your .bashrc. You may want either echo 'neofetch' >> .bashrc or neofetch | sed -e 's:%:a:g' | sed -e "s:^\\(.*\\)$:printf '\1\\\\n':" >> .bashrc or something of that kind.

EDIT: tested out the latter command

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

true!! i meant echo neofetch >> .bashrc

[–] xan1242@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who's the true noob now? Smh

(/s)

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

actually. i meant neofetch > bashrc, as in neofetch is better. checkmate

/s

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It's a dangerous command because a single > destroys your .bashrc.

This is why you have a dotfiles repository, you noob!

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a redirection, not a pipe.

[–] radix@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly, that's bloat