this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
1 points (50.7% liked)
[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation
6591 readers
1 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
- Encourage conversation in your post
- Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
- Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lei's are ceremonial, too.
Ok, then maybe that shouldn't happen either? I'm just not big on cultural appropriation, especially when it's one culture appropriating another culture they committed genocide against and never apologized for.
Cultural appropriation is a debate of its own. The wikipedia page on cultural appropriation explains it better than I can. My view is that yes, it would be bad if people started wearing pa'u's on a regular basis because they think it looks cool with no respect for where it came from. Wearing one to Hawaii day at school is not bad because the intention is to celebrate the culture.
Later this month I'm going to an Oktoberfest party and people will be wearing lederhosen. I live in the USA. Is that offensive?
But again, the U.S. didn't commit genocide against Germany.
Yeah I guess not. I don't think that's a qualifier for cultural appropriation though.
Well no, I think that literally appropriating their culture by wearing their ceremonial clothing is a qualifier for that. That it's appropriating a culture that America committed genocide against is just the icing on the cake.
Britain engaged in a strategy of 'terror bombing', the deliberate murder of German civilians, during WW2, killing over a million people. If a Brit wears a lederhosen, is that offensive? What about a Russian? French folk?
The present is more important than the past. In the past, we've all killed each other in horrific, cruel ways. What matters is the present - Native tribes often still use the national dress they're depicted with (without much concern for accuracy in most cases) in important cultural folkways, and Native Americans in general still suffer from severe discrimination. For that reason, not past genocides (though the past genocides are obviously important to recognize and acknowledge), is tribal 'costume' inappropriate and insensitive.
Indigenous Americans often get pretty offended when white people wear their traditional clothing. I'm not sure why this isn't the same.
If you mean lederhosen, then the second paragraph explains why it's different. If you mean the grass skirts, then I can't comment, as I don't know if there's a ceremonial component to grass skirts that would make wearing one offensive.
I meant grass skirts.