this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
142 points (86.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35822 readers
964 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There has been a ton of CSAM and CP arrests in the US lately, especially from cops and teachers, along with at least one female teacher seducing boys as young as 12. I cannot understand the attraction to kids. Even teens. Do these people think they are having a relationship, or it is somehow okay to take away another human beings' innocence? Is it about sex, power, or WTH is it? Should AI generated CSAM and CP be treated the same as a real person since it promotes the same issues? I am a grandfather, and I am worried about how far this will go with the new AI being able to put anyone's face into a Porno movie too.

It seems to me that a whole new set of worldwide guidelines and laws need to be put into effect asap.

How difficult would it be for AI photo apps to filter out words, so someone cannot make anyone naked?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Let me preface this by saying I DO NOT SUPPORT CSAM!

The only issue I take with AI generated images is that theres no true "age" to the picture and any legislation that would allow people to be jailed or charged would have to be worded very carefully.

"Depicting clearly underage subject matter if it were a person or using prompts to generate someone who clearly appears under aged" simply because someone could be marked for life for typing in "naked elf" and the program spits out something with small boobs and childlike features and not having their HD shredded immediately.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats exactly my point. Sure the courts may rule in your favor eventually but you just got marched out of work in handcuffs for possession of CSAM, your entire personal and professional circle knows and any explanation you offer is going to sound like total bullshit.

"It was an AI generated image, and it was an elf! She just looked young, but not like illegal young! Guys you have to believe me!"

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world -3 points 1 year ago

As if I needed another reason to never watch anime.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Sir, I'm detecting a strong odor of weeb coming from this vehicle."

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Was it the waifu seat covers? The vinyl wrap? The bumper stickers? What gave it away?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Depicting clearly underage subject matter if it were a person or using prompts to generate someone who clearly appears under aged" simply because someone could be marked for life for typing in "naked elf" and the program spits out something with small boobs and childlike features and not having their HD shredded immediately.

Has that ever happened though? I don’t think it happens as much as people imagine it does. This is an issue with any CP, not just ai generated stuff.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So…. 1) they were obviously child like.

However, while the cartoon characters were elves and pixies, they were also clearly young elves and pixies, which led to concerns the images were linked to child sexual abuse.

  1. he didn’t just view it, he downloaded it and kept it in a spank bank for 3 years.

Ronald Clark downloaded the Japanese anime cartoons three years ago, setting in train events that would see him in court in Auckland and jailed for three months for possessing objectionable material

  1. he had prior convictions for sexually assaulting a 12 year old boy- and I’m guessing there’s parole agreements to not have CP material.

Clark has previous convictions for indecently assaulting a teenage boy and has been through rehabilitation programmes, but the video nasties he was watching in this case were all cartoons and drawings.

  1. it was for the artistic merit! Uh huh. I watch porn for the story too! /s

Clark admitted he was interested in the images but he said it was for their artistic merit and as "a bit of a laugh". He did not find them sexually arousing, he said.

I think it’s safe to say he didn’t get convicted for simply viewing a search result. So I stand by what I said: it doesn’t happen as often as people think it does. Even if you come down on one side… that’s one instance in a global world.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not congress' job to make perfect laws, that'd be even less efficient than the one we have now. The interpretation and "fine-tuning" of law is the job of courts, and is literally handled case-by-case and in the hands of judges and literal armies of lawyers every year.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, when someone gets arrested for possession of CSAM because someone decided those pixels looked a little young and their entire life comes crashing down around their ears, the arrest makes the papers and its forever out there. I'm sure they wont mind at all because after they had to financially ruin themselves to beat the charges in court they were found innocent.

Or

The law gets written well by people that we the people pay to do their job and write the laws.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except everyone handwaves away the whole "written well" or "carefully written" part, because there's no actual good place to draw that line. Which is why you and nobody else can think of one. It will always be eventually up to some judges/juries subjective interpretations, regardless of what line you gave them to work with.

So, they're just going to ban it all. They do not consider digital art collections to be of very great importance, they're more interested in things that involve lots and lots of money, generally. Or things that can be used to stoke fear, so they can come in and get a legislative notch on their belt "saving the day" with some half cocked fix.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to get it straight, by "digital art collections" are you talking about that folder of anime girls on your computer?

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, when I say they don't care about digital art collection, I really mean all digital art. They won't ban all digital art, of course, they're just going to make no exceptions for AI generated artwork when considering what is or is not banned. Similarly, using someone's facsimile, which is not currently illegal afaik, should be.