this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1486 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5846 readers
2748 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that kind of thing can happen when you actually research history rather than ask one person. There's a reason anecdotal evidence isn't given much credence.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So my options in this scenario:

  1. read a first hand account from my ancestor and parse out any personal feelings that cloud the truth

  2. read an opinion from a nameless stranger online who has done nothing but doubt what I have read with my own eyes

As you can see here, the 'anecdotal evidence' is coming from you, and the historical truth that actually existed is documented in this journal.

Get your head out of your ass.

[–] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are those your only options? You already ruled out researching what the actual truth is? Don't take my word for it, prove me wrong. If I can be proven wrong, I want to know. My evidence is empirical, but 2nd hand. Better than anecdotal, but not proof in itself. Your grandfather's journal is primary, but anecdotal. Would you rather be right, or be correct? I'd rather be correct.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a first hand account written by a person who I trust.

You can fuck off with your 2nd hand bullshit.

You are wrong, misled and propagandized.

You are a fool.

Oh, my research into the matter was propaganda? Is all of the rest of the actual data propaganda too? You have anecdotal evidence, which I have no doubt your grandfather believed was true, but which does not necessarily mean it is correct. The fact is that the vast majority of those who fled the USSR citing persecution had very much done something worthy of persecution. Most commonly, withholding the means of production from their workers.

If I am wrong though, show me the proof. Anecdotal evidence is useful for verifying knowledge, and for creating hypotheses. For proof though, actual data is required.