Firefox

17910 readers

205 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

178

submitted 1 year ago by jsdz@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mozilla seems to be asleep at the wheel, when it once drove online activity and communications. We have some suggestions where it could go.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're welcome! I'm actually in the process of pitching it to my company to replace our Electron app, which has caused a bunch of problems for us.

[–] garam@lemmy.my.id 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have a pros and cons between tauri and electron? Thank you

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'll just describe how they work, and you can decide the pros and cons for yourself.

Electron:

bundles browser with the app, so the dev can control exactly the version of the browser they're shipping
language is JavaScript
quite stable from a development perspective

Tauri:

uses system browser (Edge on Windows, Safari on macOS), so the browser gets updated with the system, not the app
language is Rust
younger project, but it's also a relatively simple project

I want to move our app to Tauri because:

we need to refactor anyway because recent versions of Electron break our app
install size is large, and we could refactor the web app to be offline-ready instead of relying on Electron features
Tauri gets security updates for the browser "for free," so we could have our app "auto update" by just being a PWA
if we add desktop-specific features (e.g. move some of our computation to the FE), it won't be in JS, so Rust offers better options (i.e. threading)

So since we don't need the features Electron offers, I want to use Tauri to reduce our maintenance overhead.