this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

Socialism

2843 readers
21 users here now

Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.


Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it reasonable for parents to panic at cartoon nudity in school textbooks? Only if we embrace irrational taboos about bodies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbstractifyBot@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Here's a short summary of the linked article


Click to expand

The document discusses conservative efforts to ban books that teach children about sex and anatomy. It notes that as a child, the author learned about sex from a book but did not understand it at the time. While some parents may be shocked by explicit illustrations in books like "It's Perfectly Normal," the author argues these images serve educational purposes and there is no reason to make sex a taboo topic. The repressive cultural stigma around topics like menstruation and masturbation does more harm than good.

Overall, the author believes it is past time to interrogate society's strange discomfort with nudity and sexuality, as these are normal human realities and children will learn about such topics one way or another.


This comment was generated by a bot. Send comments and complaints via private message.