this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37643 readers
166 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it akin to the revolutionary code-breaking system from Digital Fortress called TRANSLTR?

I hope it won't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but there are already algorithms which can replace it.

[–] localhost@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

They can replace them going forward. A major issue is that many governments (and likely other malicious actors) have been hoarding encrypted communication in hopes of accessing it once sufficiently big quantum computer emerges.

[–] derbis@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am wondering why we are waiting, if it's an inevitability

[–] OmnipotentEntity@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Because security is still a big deal. There are post quantum algorithms, but there are similar post quantum algorithms that have been proven to be flawed. It's important to allow technology like this to mature prior to adoption.