this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
749 points (98.6% liked)

Personal Finance

3742 readers
1 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When I hear about middle class people struggling to pay the bills, I'm always curious what their lifestyle looks like and where they are spending their money. Literally today I saw a news article that broke down a family's monthly expenses like this:

  • $1700 rent

  • $800 payment for two cars

  • $400 insurance

  • $250 phone

  • $60 internet

  • food paid for with whatever's left

The big thing that stood out were the cars. They obviously bought some brand new cars that they couldn't afford. If they sold those and replaced them with beaters their budget would be solved.

The worst part is, the news article was trying to paint this example as proof that the economy is ruined and only new laws can save us.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Who the fuck is paying $250/mo for their phones?? I literally pay $20/mo. Unlimited voice and text, 5gb data, and pay as you go past that. But I'm on WiFi almost all the time so I've never used a lot of data.

Or does that include the cost of buying a new phone? A new android phone is like $500 and lasts probably five years. Doesn't add up

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I'm assuming they financed a flagship smartphone through the cell provider. Still a pointless waste of money

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The phone also stands out.

$250/month is just nuts! We pay like $30/month for two lines, though I could see up to $60/month for two lines being reasonable (unlimited data at Mint for two lines). We spend about $500 every 3 years or so for phones, so add in ~$30/month to save for that, round a bit for taxes, and you really shouldn't be paying more than $100/month for two lines.

Insurance also seems high. We pay ~$50/month for two cars, though they're older cars and we are in our 30s with clean records, so we've got that going for us.

So since I don't have a car payment, have inexpensive insurance, and don't pay out the nose for my phone, I save like $1400/month vs those numbers you quoted. So if the average person actually spends that much (I doubt it), by cutting out some unnecessary expenses, they could buy a house.

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure if this is really representative of everyone, but it's telling that the news decided to use that example when trying to convince viewers the economy is bad. I'd love to see more research into middle class spending habits, as I suspect that predatory lending and consumerism cause problems more than inflation.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Agreed. For now, you can check out the BLS data here. The categories leave a lot to be desired, but I think it's still interesting. Specifically, the amount people spend on transportation is terrifying, and that's definitely on the "predatory lending" end of the spectrum.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We have clean driver records and paid off cars, and insuring 3 cars 4 drivers is running $900 a month for us here. That is car insurance alone, no car payment. Phone we do pay $200 but it's covering 8 people, calls text unlimited data on 8 phones so if we made the kids pay could reduce that to about $50.

But your $50 car insurance is unusual. And not everyone can get a rate like that while simultaneously living close enough to work to manage the rest of the transportation expenses.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think it's that unusual in my area. I've never paid more than $450 or so for 6-months of coverage on two cars, and I've been with multiple insurers. Granted, I get liability only, but comprehensive coverage isn't that much more expensive (esp. on the older cars I drive). Something different is happening in Florida that isn't happening here.

And I don't live that close to work, my commute is ~25 miles each way. I live in the suburbs and work in the city.