One of my friends described it as there's difference between private property and personal property. Your toothbrush is personal property. No one cares about that. Your factory where you assemble widgets is private property, where you're paying people to convert labor into stuff you can sell.
I should read more left-wing theory. It made sense when he explained it.
Right-wingers remind me of that meme template where the dog has the ball and it's going "Throw! No Take! Only throw!"
They want a thriving economy, but they don't want to pay people wages. No pay. Only spend.
We will see who’s society is better
Did you ever read "A libertarian walks into a bear"? It's a non-fiction book about a bunch of libertarians that moved to a small town, and used their new voting bloc to try to bring about their libertarian paradise. It went badly. There were bears.
The author points out how a nearby town that was otherwise very similar. It had prospered during the time libertarians were driving their town into the ground
That's kind of fascinating. and sad. It sounds kind of self-defeating- If the other person is reasonably well adjusted, they're going to take feigned disinterest as just regular disinterest, and move on. (Or think that the other person can't hold a conversation, and move on.)
Maybe this creates a self-selection effect where the people who are afraid of being enthusiastic eventually meet each other? That would probably be best for everyone.
Republicans aren't fit to govern.
banning opinions just drives them underground
which means fewer people will find them and engage with them.
You're going to get more people turning to Nazis if it's just out and about in the open. If YouTube was running ads for nazisim, they'd get converts. If the only nazi stuff you see is scribbled on the bathroom walls, it has less legitimacy and thus fewer converts.
I think a lot about something i read somewhere - "you hate every piece of capitalism but won't connect the dots to see that's the picture".
I didn't recognize the source and thought to myself this is either archaic or amateur. It feels purple by modern standards.
Hey the SRD says tieflings "can speak, read, and write Common and Infernal."
I'm reminded of that Sartre quote again
Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.
The only case I can think of is like you had to call 911 for an emergency and you want the people around you to also hear the dispatcher.
For day to day stuff, not really.
I'm pretty sure private for-profit water is absolutely worse than government run water. Everyone can at least nominally vote to change the government. A private org is beholden to no one except shareholders (if they have any), and maybe laws (if they exist, are relevant, and are enforced).
We already had a gilded age where we learned how low for-profit entities will go. We had saw dust in bread, chalk in milk, and worse.
For profit food production is giving us price gouging and a water crisis. Would government do better? Well, given the current administration maybe not.