this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
48 points (84.3% liked)

3DPrinting

15276 readers
103 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I shudder to think what the answer to this will be, but... How do you propose this should be done?

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Eugenics. The crowd beating this drum always reinvents eugenics with a new mask.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Actually no, mostly education and raising people in a world that doesnt endorse having kids everywhere.

Example: In the developed countries we are still incentivizing families with kids. Why the fuck would we do that in a current environmental crisis? We should’ve started this in the 50-60’s and now we’d have waaay less cars to pollute for example.

But instead only a hint of a mention of overpopulation being an actual issue is insulting to people because “god damn, having kids and eating meat is my god given right” - thought 9 billion people.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Developed countries, through education and economic realities, generally have children at or below the replacement rate. Most of their growth comes from immigration from other countries with much higher birth rates.

The incentives you're talking about are there to stabilize the population so there isn't more people in nursing homes than there are propping up the economy taking care of those people. It's a tough situation, and with the capitalist systems in place and a lack of long promised automation in many industries, it's worrying for everyone involved.

So really it's already working the way you want, largely. If you want something more dramatic you need to find another lever, and at the same time you need to balance your goal with the dropping population in the workforce so you can afford to care for the elderly.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Free access to contraceptives, proper sex education, and protecting abortion rights would go a long way to reducing the birth rate.