Mildly Interesting

17390 readers

30 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

Terevos@lemm.ee

226

the FDA is considering a ban on menthol cigarette sales (www.verifythis.com)

submitted 1 year ago by TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

158 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aelwero@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not a false analogy, it's just brutally logical and completely disregards the merits of the situation...

Logging is the deadliest occupation on earth. Banning minorities from the logging industry would greatly improve their odds of survival. It's exactly the same as banning their chosen cigarettes.

I don't really have a preference on tobacco bans at all tbh. I do think people should have options, but I don't disagree with the intent of smoking bans either... the issue here is, it's not a choice between those two for everyone, it's a selective ban that removes the options from a singular group, and the selection is based on race and orientation.

The merits of the ban are, in my opinion, not all that relevant. I don't disagree with banning cigarettes entirely, I don't disagree with onerous taxation as an incentive to reduce sales, I don't object to any measures that are indiscriminate, because I don't really care that much tbh, I switched to vapes in 2012.

I object to the specificity.

From another perspective, were talking about a ban on tobacco that selectively preserves tobacco use for straight white people... does that make it more clear why I object?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

brutally logical

No it's totally unrelated to the discussionl. I think your objection is very poorly thought out.

I used to smoke menthols and I'm white as the driven snow my man. Nothing racist about targeting the cigarettes preferred by the people who are majority smokers by percentage.

I also think "this doesn't effect me so I don't care" is a poor way of looking at governance.