83
submitted 9 months ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ooops@kbin.social -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's an interesting headline... what did they expect instead? "After 18 months of only giving Ukraine a fraction of what we can spare for laughs and giggles we now probably need to actually support them for once to replace the missing US aid"?

[-] agarorn@feddit.de 10 points 9 months ago

How much money would be enough so that you don't call it laughs and giggles anymore?

[-] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works -3 points 9 months ago

Enough that the largest economic bloc in the world is able to support their neighbor and ally without depending on a single country on a different continent.

[-] agarorn@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Give me a number pls

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 8 months ago

After 18 months of only giving Ukraine a fraction of what we can spare for laughs and giggles we now probably need to actually support them for once to replace the missing US aid

Are you really that daft? In one year the aid sent to Ukraine exceeded the entire annual military budget of Russia

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

You are really not getting the most obvious sarcasm possible?

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I thought you were arguing that the US hadn't provided enough.

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

I was arguing that "The EU can't replace US support" isn't news. Just like "the US can't replace EU support wouldn't be news". That's basically just saying the EU (or US) is not able to just double their support on a whim. If they could it would also mean they gave only a fraction of what they could give for no actual reason but letting someone else do the work.

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
83 points (93.7% liked)

World News

31456 readers
1364 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS