this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
1149 points (96.1% liked)

> Greentext

7466 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

God, I couldn't put my finger on why I didn't like it. I was just so bored, even with the exploration which I normally love. All of the fun parts of FO4 and Skyrim are missing. Just walking around and enjoying the world is completely missing, replaced by a pretty shitty space travel mechanic.

Fast travel to space, then fast travel to another planet. Fast travel to the surface and bunny hop to an objective through a boring city/space station/whatever. Fast travel back to your ship and do it all over again. I never made it far in the story because I couldn't be bothered to give a damn. The characters were completely uninteresting at best. oh average they were mildly annoying.

Let me take off from the planets surface and fly in to space a few times before you lock me in to fast traveling. Let me fly from space and scream in to the atmosphere, shooting over the surface looking for a safe place to land, and navigate my way in to the city. Maybe 90% of the surface is uninteresting, that's fine. But let me at least have some fun learning that.

They made every safe choice, and lost the sense of adventure. Because adventures aren't supposed to be safe.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No Man's Sky has you covered, in all the ways Starfield doesn't.

[–] Starshader@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

No Man's Sky was terrible at launch.

[–] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Starfield isn't a great game but no man's lie is not better. Both are kinda shitty. Norman's sky was just way worse when it was released.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

NMS does exploration and procedural generation way better than Starfield

[–] American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No mans sky is perfectly okay rn, I have no idea what you're talking about

[–] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good for you if you like it. It's still a soulless collectaton with meh building options and meh combat. It's better than it was at release but it's still a absolute average game.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The building options are also better than SF though. It's just much more intuitive and less grindy than Starfield is.

I don't play it myself, my brother does. It seems fun for those who love exploration, and the worlds at least have some variety and the campaign holds more interest than that of starfields'.

Although yeah. At the end of the day we're a bunch of peasants who are arguing over which type of moldy bread is best, while the lords still get their money for the purchase.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Fast travel to space, then fast travel to another planet. Fast travel to the surface and bunny hop to an objective through a boring city/space station/whatever. Fast travel back to your ship and do it all over again.

Loading Screens: The Game

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

It makes me appreciate the tech in StarCitizen, pity it's just lacking a game.