Technology

58017 readers

3278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

279

submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Disney’s Loki faces backlash over reported use of generative AI / A Loki season 2 poster has been linked to a stock image on Shutterstock that seemingly breaks the platform’s licensing rules regard...::A promotional poster for the second season of Loki on Disney Plus has sparked controversy amongst professional designers following claims that it was created using generative AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

So people are mad at the show creators... because an image that some designer purchased for a poster... may have been AI generated... even though it's not confirmed... and even if it's true, that makes the designer of the poster a victim of a scammer...

So, what, are we just going full rabid at the very mention of AI now?

[–] Wilibus@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think people are mad because they banned technology on the platform and then clearly continued to use it.

Rules for thee, not for me.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so then why are people targeting the show instead of Shutterstock?

Even then, being mad at Shutterstock doesn't make sense because the person who started selling something AI generated on a platform that doesn't allow it obviously wouldn't disclose that fact.

And you can't just ban anything you think might be AI generated immediately, because then you just become the fuckwit mods of r/art.

[–] Wilibus@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I will reiterate my point. This outrage is not rooted in some deep seeded hatred towards AI, it is because Disney claimed they didn't want it used on their streaming platform and then immediately used it to market one of their flagship products.

[–] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 2 points 11 months ago

And I will reiterate my point: The outrage still doesn't make sense to anyone with any understanding of the facts. If the image is AI generated, it was still purchased most-likely unknowingly from a service that is not supposed to host such content at all.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

anything to make marvel look bad. haters are just grasping at straws now