199
submitted 1 year ago by gobbling871@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Oracle responds to Red Hat

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShiningWing@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Why do you think it would? Oracle rebranding RHEL and selling it as their own distro in direct competition with Red Hat is no doubt the biggest reason they made this change in the first place

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They could just charge for-profit companies instead.

There would be ways to get around that, but then again, there are ways to get around the current implementation too

[-] garam@lemmy.my.id 3 points 11 months ago

The problem is, they can't charge much. CIQ/Rocky, have very very cheap contract, and even you charge the vendor, it means all burden are in red hat, and any feature that CIQ/Rocky asked should be fullfilled, and it's not... align with red hat goals in the end...

Same as Alma/CloudLinux

[-] twitterfluechtling@lemmy.pathoris.de 1 points 11 months ago

They could just charge for-profit companies instead.

How? The whole point of the GPL is that they can't.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
199 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

45530 readers
1717 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS