this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
674 points (95.8% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2211 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't know who's down voting you, but yes, this is actually textbook strategy for insurgent warfare.

Little guy makes a move with the goal of provoking big guy to create a security clampdown and overreact. This feeds little guy's PR and recruitment efforts, as well as potentially overstretching big guy's resources.

I even have a recent and precisely on topic video that covers it:

https://youtu.be/UKvzOF-toIA?si=ge1cJA2H7_NtDJcu

He even references the ACTUAL DOD MANUALS that detail this strategy.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, especially considering the initial attack was likely somewhat related to trying to stop Israel and Saudi Arabia's growing friendship, but can anyone name a country that wouldn't demand vengeance after the atrocities at the music festivals and overrun communities?

The attack was designed to be brutal to force a brutal response, probably designed to be like that by Iranian religious fanatics who couldn't care less about the Palestinian population as long as they're a good weapon to use against Israel.

None of that justifies Israel doing awful things but it does make it harder to think about.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago

The other option is to be sad about the atrocities, not angry. Yes I know that basically doesn't happen especially anymore with everyone on such high edge.

But, if we want to not immediately go this route every time to not play into the hands of terrorists then the answer is sad. Empathetic. Feel the pain and hurt of all the people lost and what it would take for someone to do something horrible. It needs to be a tragedy first and an excuse for a slapping contest after.

It won't work on everyone but it's a far better response, and will get people on the side of the victims more than the terrorists and then with a slower response less needless casualties.
But what leader have you seen been upset about this and not just excited to finally do something interesting like war? Empathy hasn't been important to society for too long now.