this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
222 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73850 readers
4264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Clemson University to ban TikTok on all campus networks effective Monday, July 10.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ablackcatstail@lemmy.goblackcat.com 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

IMHO, this isn't s good move. I don't have any love for TikTok but I hate fascism even more.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m not following. Can you elaborate a bit on how a private university banning TikTok is fascism?

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Clemson isn't private, it's public. It is certainly their prerogative to secure their network and their users' data but there are definitely concerns over government censorship. I don't think this issue is as black and white as people ITT are making it out to be and absent a larger policy stance that would van TikTok or it's practices, I'm not sure this is the right move though I understand their position given the inaction of state and national legislatures in banning foreign spyware

[–] zaph@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They're not banning their students from using tiktok, they're blocking access to a website on their own networks. That is how network security works. I have many IP addresses block for many customers because some website shouldn't be accessed on networks with PII. It's really not that complicated.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I'm well aware - as a public university things are a bit different as they are agents of the state so this becomes a free speech issue. Also, if a university's student internet is the same network containing PII systems like their student records, there are much bigger problems. That's why I mentioned that this action without any legislation that would curtail Bytedance's data collection presents a student rights conundrum. The app does not (as far as we are aware) inject or capture information from the users network but rather the user themselves which they have consented to. The larger issue is whether or not the US should allow foreign entities to collect this info and that's not something the university should be able to decide but rather the state and federal regulatory agencies and legislatures

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol how is it fascism if you could just use your mobile data to access whatever weird social network you want?

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because there is no real Operational Security justification for its ban, that doesn't instantly catch all US-based social media platforms as well. It's not about security, it's about control. The feds have no under-the-table deals or even overt surveillance partnerships with TikTok. They do have that with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and beyond. In fact, the CIA has financial stakes with those companies as well, and often were early sources of funding for them: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-media-is-a-tool-of-the-cia-seriously/

Which I guess is fine because the CIA has never been the enemy of the American people, ever.

[–] zaph@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So an American school doesn't block an American website that American intelligence agencies have access to and you're wondering why they wouldn't allow a Chinese website that Chinese intelligence agencies probably have access to? I completely agree that Meta and Twitter and all that are horrible for security but it's still relevant who houses that data. I choose not to use any of them but it's completely understandable why a country would hesitate to trust a foreign nation we have no relevant triety with.

[–] RedWizard@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The Chinese agencies have access to whatever data they want on you. There is no moratorium on data brokers doing business with China. Even if there were, they would get that data from one of their BRICS partners.

So they have data from TikTok. Now what? What's next? What's the threat they pose with that data to the American people or the students and faculty at this university?

What is the university protecting it's network from specifically?

The CIA has a long history of unlawfully monitoring and retaliating against US Citizens for advocating against US policy, like opposing the war in Vietnam.

From a historical standpoint, it would appear that citizens of the United States have more to fear from the CIA then they do from the People's Republic of China.

[–] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

facism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

I think you'd be better off just saying censorship.

Ultimately though we've never seen anything like this, the old school rules for what constitutes acceptable censorship might need some adjusting (especially as society learns more about what closed source algorithms made by hostile foreign powers used by the youth -- and general population -- of a nation can actually do to said nation).

It would violate my constitutional right to performing dance trends in my dining hall.