this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
1282 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45321 readers
1647 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dcat@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

in norway all the power is hydroelectric, and it’s been that way for the past 100 years.

and i don’t understand how wind turbines, solar panels, or “everything green” is somehow exclusive to europe.

[–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I really don't understand the topic well, but I searched the Internet and indeed wind generation is possible. but there is still no solar generation due to too short daylight hours. as for hydroelectric power plants, they are already around. I did not think that they are considered green, given that they require flooding of huge territories.

UPD: also, for any large wind generation, forests will most likely have to be cut down.

[–] dcat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

whaaat?! we have to flood areas for hydroelectric? and cut down forests for wind generation?! oh well, then that’s it, it’s settled.

guess we should just go back to burning coal then.

[–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 2 points 1 year ago

Why you? I was talking about my geographical area. And we don't build any wind turbines, we just use nuclear and hydroelectric power plants. although, of course, we mainly use thermal power plants.

Climate is a planetary-scale problem, so it is impossible to build environmentally friendly energy production on one side of the earth in the hope of overcoming warming. Maybe my English is not good enough. This is my third language, so I'm really sorry.