this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
148 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

59676 readers
3219 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"...like forcing users to upload copies of their government IDs to access an online service."

"Some states, like Louisiana, have tailored their bills to ban kids from seeing online porn by forcing everyone, including adults, to verify their age before using the site. Google’s proposal does not oppose age verification on porn and gambling sites."

That's terrifying. Signing up for Lemmy would require uploading a government ID. I don't know the solution to this problem, but I'm not confident this proposal is the right one.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it's from Louisiana, it's probably a bad idea. Except for gumbo.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I live in Louisiana and we don’t enforce the important laws; we definitely aren’t enforcing that one. I’m not a connoisseur de porn sites but I think Pornhub is the only site that has an ID requirement and they probably just complied so they could file a lawsuit.

Also, I could take a street car to the French Quarter right now for $1.25 and get motorboated for one additional dollar if I wanted. I have no idea what the state legislature thinks passing a porn ID law will accomplish. But rest assured, their laws mean nothing in New Orleans.

[–] artisanrox@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then it'll be used for targetted application, which is even worse.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This is what I've been saying. They probably don't care if little Jimmy knows how to skirt the id requirement by using one of the thousands of sites that don't comply with Louisiana's stupid law, but it sure would be a shame if word got out that major democrat nominees uploaded their id to a porn site one day several years ago.

This kind of law is a thin veil of "think of the children" in order to orchestrate future extortion.

[–] Capricorny90210@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago
[–] superguy@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who fucking cares about porn?

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/j6eFNRKEROw

But also the anonymous Internet is important.

Also, do you think the proposal will actually have the intended effect? Do you think COPPA has been successful? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Online_Privacy_Protection_Act#Criticisms

Children under the age of 13 absolutely have Facebook accounts. Children of all ages have DEFINITELY seen things that no one should see.

I'm not saying this isn't a topic worth discussing, but further restrictions is not the right answer.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/j6eFNRKEROw

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.