this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
305 points (95.5% liked)

Games

15902 readers
1190 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 37 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Didn't they get death threats online too, that probably made things even worse

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 63 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Man, gamers have no chill.

If you want to go after someone, go after the people in charge.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Seriously. If game companies were warehouses, the devs would be stockers, shippers and receivers. They do not get to make the big picture decisions.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nah, it's more like a factory where the devs build and operate the machines. They may be responsible for smaller issues, but they're not the ones deciding that your EV truck sucks at hauling and towing things (i.e. being a truck), they just build to the specs given the time and material constraints they're given. Blame the designers and other higher-ups.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

And let's keep this in perspecitve: You spent 60 bucks you'd rather not have in hindsight. I mean... it's not nothing by any means... but it's not an unrecoverable financial loss either...

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they want to threaten someone then they should do it face-to-face, not hiding behind the internet.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd go as far as to say maybe don't threaten anyone with death

Or just don't threaten anyone at all. If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all.

[–] Kraivo@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

While i completely agree that nobody should be a target of a hate speech, i kind of understand how frustrating cyberpunk 2077 was at release compared to what CDPR promised.

That's just an example of what happens when you overhype people and extremely underdeliver. Spoiler: they hate you.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

In the current state of the internet, they probably started getting death threats shortly after the project was announced cuz the kerning on an in-game billboard was a little off.

Doesn't take much now-a-days.