Privacy

31390 readers

66 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

295

Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Keyword Search Warrant - a digital dragnet tool that allows law enforcement to identify everyone who searched the internet for a specific term or phrase. (www.eff.org)

submitted 11 months ago by minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hellequin67@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Headquartered in the US so I wouldn't guarantee it.
This was against Google specifically but I would imagine it would hold up against any US based search engine they felt someone was using.

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right, they must respond to a subpoena. But they don't retain search records, do they?

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In some cases they must retain the information. Like your ISP in the USA had to retain data for le purposes.

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Your statement contradicts their stated policy, and I'm not aware of any such requirement in the US.

https://duckduckgo.com/privacy

IP retention is addressed in the first paragraph under "privacy policy", and it stated they don't save or log it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How do you know? You don't control their servers

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your point is not unique: all websites require your trust.

So if that's your threat model you can't use any search engine.

But if we want to put that aside and discuss their stated policy, then the link I provided addressed the parent statement that

In some cases they must retain the information. Like your ISP in the USA had to retain data for le purposes.

Which directly refutes that there is any such requirement.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 11 months ago

You shouldn't trust any search engine. That's my point.