this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
116 points (90.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43944 readers
743 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Modified post. Read the edit at the buttom.

Now, call me crazy, I don't think so! I have been an addict and I know how it is to be an addict, but I don't think sugar is as addictive as cocaine. And I really am frustrated with people who say such things.

This notion that it's as addictive drives me crazy! I mean, imagine someone gullible who says, well, "I can control my addiction to ice cream, heck I can go without ice cream for months, if it's as addictive as cocaine, why not give cocaine a chance? It's not like it's gonna destroy me or something?" Yeah, I have once been this gullible (when I was younger) and I hate this.

I do crave sugar and I do occasionally (once per week and sometimes twice a month) buy sugary treats/lays packet (5 Indian Rupees, smallest one) to quench that craving, but I refuse to believe that it is as addictive as cocaine or any other drugs. PS: My last lays packet was 45 ago and I am fine, and this is the most addictive substance I have consumed.

I am pretty some people here have been addicted to cocaine (truly no judgement, I hope you are sober now), so what say you?

PS: If you haven't been addicted to anything drastic as drugs, you are still welcome to chip in.


edit: thank you all for adding greater context.

I realize now that when they talk about sugar, they are not just talking abt lays and ice creams, but sugar in general. I get the studies now. But media is doing a terrible job of reporting on studies.

Also, the media depiction of scientific studies is really the worst. I mean, they make claims which garbage and/or incomplete data or publish articles on studies which make more alarming claims. Also, maybe wait for a consensus before you publish anything, i.e., don't publish anything which isn't peer reviewed and replicated multiple times. Yes, your readers might miss out on the latest and greatest, but it isn't really helpful if the latest and greatest studies in science aren't peer reviewed and backed up well by data.

I feel like a headline "SUGAR IS AS ADDICTIVE AS COCAINE" can and will be life destroying if you don't give enough information. I feel like there should be an ethical responsibility to not sensationalize studies, maybe instead of "SUGAR IS AS ADDICTIVE AS COCAINE" give a headline like "Sugar and Addiction, what science says."

also, https://i.imgur.com/VrBgrjA.png ss of bing chat gpt answering the question.

some articles: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/25/is-sugar-really-as-addictive-as-cocaine-scientists-row-over-effect-on-body-and-brain

https://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/experts-is-sugar-addictive-drug

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/cravings/202209/is-sugar-addictive

https://brainmd.com/blog/what-do-sugar-and-cocaine-have-in-common/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well documented fact, source: trust me bro

After complaining about actual sources.

[โ€“] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2008001/article/10463/4149059-eng.htm

Source on premodern Inuits living substantially shorter lifespans

Obviously I can't source a negative that there aren't dietary studies on people with "normal" digestion doing keto for decades. You can try finding them and discovering no e have been done on your own.

[โ€“] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lifespan for literally every group I can think of has gone massively upwards. Any evidence that that's due to diet in the inuit case? Any evidence that the diets of the people referenced even changed?

[โ€“] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's in the link I supplied. They talk about how it went from twenty nine years old to seventy from 1930 to now. You want to guess what the biggest change was for Inuit in that time?

[โ€“] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Acesss to modern healthcare? The ability to hunt with modern techniques/tools? There's lots of possibilities which is why we need to study things not just make overarching statements and take them as fact. You're making enormous assumptions with no evidence, which is what you were complaining about with the other person, even when provided with (admittedly specious, but interesting) evidence.

[โ€“] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Read the link as it does in fact discuss this. I did supply evidence you just haven't read it.

It doesn't mention diet, nutrition or food even once actually. You're just full of shit apparently. Or provide a quote from the article?

[โ€“] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I mean sorry if that offends you but food is literally not mentioned in the article.

[โ€“] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

There is no mention of food in the article you provided.