Anarchism and communism are 95% the same in regards to goals. They just have different views on how to get there, that differ very little or a lot depending on the specific sub ideology, of which there are many. The 5% with different goals are some anarchist tendencies which want to keep markets and money, like mutualism. Everyone else wants a stateless, moneyless and classless society where people contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need on the basis of mutual aid. And no, "anarcho"-capitalism is not a thing, that's an oxymoron.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I'd be a ok with just some wealth redistribution, but everyday without that I am getting more radicalized.

[–] hernanca@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wealth redistribution is only resetting the board, not a change in the game.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i like the game, just not my starting position

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's literally the game.

[–] ciko22i3@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i just lost the fucking game

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

god dammit.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Same.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you should learn more about the history of the two concepts then, because they've never been mutually exclusive.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess their different mental images of the final step of an ideal economic system under their chosen system has a lot of overlap.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think you got a notification when Numuruzero said they're just joshing you, they think it's for atheism