World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
You don't seem very keen on answering the question.
Would it be better if they didn't knock, and instead just did what Hamas does, and bomb the civilians without a warning?
I think we've established here, that not dropping bombs onto civilian population in the first place would be optimal, but since both sides are going to do it anyways and aren't going to stop, then which way is likely to lead to less collateral damage; giving a warning before hand or not warning at all? What do you think it tells about Israel that they're willing to knock first? Do you think Hamas would do that if they had the capability?
My answer to the question is that knocking isn't a warning. It's just bombing civilians. They can claim that using smaller bombs is somehow nicer but at the end of the day they're still bombing people and then they're kind enough to follow that up with bigger bombs. I don't have to be pragmatic and accept that there's going to be some bombing of civilians or indeed any bombing or attacks on anyone from any side in any conflict. You don't have to tolerate the actions of bastards doing bastard things.
Why are you criticizing Israel for the one half decent thing they're doing which is letting people know before hand that this building is going to get bombed so you better get the hell out? That's such an odd thing to critizice them for.
How do you feel about Hamas attacking that music festival and murdering 250 civilians? I'm sure those people would've liked a warning too, don't you think?
Again: roof knocking is not a warning it is just bombing civilians. Just because you hit them first with a small bomb doesn't grant you an moral high ground or count as a warning, you're just bombing civilians. The only right thing to do is to not bomb civilians with anything at all.
It is simply engaging in the exact same terrorism that hamas participates in but they're trying to frame their terrorism as better somehow.
Hamas shoots rockets from near mosks, schools, hospitals etc. because they know that the proximity to civilians is going to deter Israel to a certain degree. Do you think they would knock first if Hamas had their military locations on the open desert? Ofcourse they wouldn't. The only reason they do so is to atleast try and minimize civilian casualties when doing airstrikes. I don't know why you keep talking as if Israel is intentionally targeting civilians when that's what they're explicitly trying to avoid from doing. It's Hamas whose intentionally targeting civilians. That's almost exclusively what they do. They fire constant barrages of unguided rockets into residential areas and they just attacked Israel targeting almost exclusively civilians including the 250 murdered at the music festival. 250 innocent, unarmed civilians shot to death like animals, yet you take issue with the fact that Israel dares to give them a warning to get the hell out first. The unlucky ones that unfortunelately get killed in these strikes is what Hamas would call "human shields". It's not an accident that they're there. Hamas not only doesn't care about Israeli civilians, they don't care about their own either.
Ofcourse the right thing to do would to not bomb civilians at all. That's what civilized people normally tend to avoid doing. There however are some groups of people that aren't so concerned about such things. Israel is not one of them. While there's a shit ton to critizice them for, focusing on the act of giving a warning before an airstrike is just nonsensical. Also, as I'm sure you already know, it's not like they just start with the roof knock. They use phones first.
I assure you Israel is targeting civilians deliberately and if they aren't they're fucking terrible shots as they've killed thousands Palestinians over the last few weeks. Israel is a colonial apartheid state that is looking to seize territory and displace Palestinian people from their homes. They're following the same playbook as seen in places like their americas and Australia. Colonialism isn't civilised or nice it's just plain imperial aggression.
Israel could take all Palestinian land and kill every single Palestinian tomorrow if they wanted to. They've had this capacity for a long time yet they've decided not to use it. What do you think Hamas would do in their position?