this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
272 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, so you mean the photos in the training dataset that violate medical privacy

If they're published in a textbook then they're not private.

will not have given informed consent for those photos to be inserted into an AI model for child porn

Again, an AI model doesn't have to be created specifically for the purpose of child porn in order for it to be able to generate child porn. Most of these AI image models are very general purpose, they can create images of all kinds of things.

We're going in circles here and you're just getting angrier in your responses, I don't think this is headed anywhere useful at this point.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Nope, this is headed nowhere useful, because we have a fundamentally different sense of ethics.