this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)
196
18144 readers
1454 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
the game also works >60fps with that mod no problem. the devs are just assholes
Was wild to me how much lower the minimums are for Baldur’s Gate when it came out ~18 months later. You’d think as a dev you’d just want people to play your game, and that if it’s a little less pretty for some people, that’s okay.
what do you mean, i didnt say that elden ring could run at 60 on the deck, it just can in general
Sorry, I must’ve misunderstood. I was more just agreeing with the devs being assholes. I have a 1080 and don’t care enough about raytracing to upgrade. Elden Ring, with its 1070 minimum req, made me think I’d have to upgrade sooner than later. But then Baldur’s Gate will work on a 900 series. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I think they're just not used to PC setups tbh. The Dark Souls games are famously much worse on PC than console.