this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
445 points (91.3% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2935 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So if hamas manages to get more powerful weapons, it’s justifiable for them to hit back israel?

This is essentially Israel's Cassus Belli for obliterating Hamas. Whether you agree with Israel here or not, Hamas as it stands will cease to exist. They have no chance of holding ground and Israel has made no bones about their willingness to engage in tunnel-fighting.

It's a mistake to think this isn't a 9/11 style realignment. Everyone's concerns here should be on the treatment of Gazans in a post-Hamas world.

From a pure realpolitik sort of reasoning, Israel's lack of simultaneous humanitarian commitment hurts them here. I disagree with some of their choices on moral lines, but even Kissinger would disagree with their moves (though for different reasons).

No one is above criticism, but reality is going to happen. At this point, only the future really matters.

It's easy to paint me as callous here but I think taking the easy road out in this conversation ignores the reality of the situation, and valid discussions that could be had, over insipid political slogans.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remeber how isis and alqueda were destroyed after the us bombed the shit out of them? Neither do I.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These are extremely different situations, but also to suggest that ISIS is at all a major player right now is silly.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It all has to do with driving recruitment, mass killing of Palestinians will bolters hamas, and the thing about terrorist organizations is that they don't have to be "major players".

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They do if they want to be effective

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or they become affiliated with a larger cell, and the cycle continues.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hamas is currently the government. It won't be the same.

I'm not saying there won't be terrorism. There are already other terrorist groups in Gaza. There will be terrorism.

But the Gazan people will be able to have elections and have self-determination again.

If anything, this is a totally practical, non-morality reason why Israel should be setting up aid camps. There's really no argument against it. They should be showing a closed fist to Hamas and an open hand to Gazans in general.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree on your last statement, flattening residential areas however I'd not an open hand to Palestinians. This will get worse before it gets better.