this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
199 points (100.0% liked)

196

18206 readers
1190 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
199
Peak Content [Rule] (i.ebayimg.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

And if Wikipedia is to be believed it's presented in a eye wateringly high resolution of 112p.

This high of res.

Edit: Of course the bit rate was pretty damn low as well. Here's a comparison video I found. This comparison uses the higher bit rate version from the Shrek GBA video cart not the Shrek+Shark Tale video cart though so keep in mind, this is the better version.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not gonna lie, 112p video is actually kinda amazing for a gameboy advanced cartridge. I dunno how much space that'd take up, but I'd bet it's more than your typical GBA cart.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They also ran at a much lower frame rate and compressed the audio quite a bit

Basically they had to fit both movies in less than 64MB.

[–] prayer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To be fair, we still do a similar thing with movies today when we want to send them on discord, crunching it down to 25-50MB

[–] Raxiel@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I wasn't expecting to watch Tremors while sitting on the toilet this evening but here we are.

[–] SternburgExport@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

That makes two of us

[–] Raxiel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Careful, they can sense movement

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

64 MB... including the player and codec! The GBA cannot decode video natively so a lot of trickery was required to get a decent performance.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly

It's honestly impressive they even were able to do it

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, there were way more efficient ways to store video on the go in the 2000s, like MiniDVD players with tiny screens. The codec is in firmware and the video format and medium is standardized. It’s the easiest way to sell small, cheap gigabytes of storage if you need no quick random access. And the family might already have the more useful laptop-like portable DVD player with a full-sized drive and almost every home video title was available on those.