this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1191 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

5223 readers
3305 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)

How do you effectively remove firearms from the equation at this point? Doesn’t the US have something like 120 guns per 100 residents? I don’t want to be the guy tasked with taking someone else’s gun away, that sounds incredibly dangerous. It also doesn’t seem fair to task someone else with that duty.

I won’t disagree that it’s a problem, but I don’t have a solution either.

[–] Vegasimov@reddthat.com 32 points 10 months ago (51 children)

Every country that currently has gun control laws, at some point didn't have gun control laws and did have an armed population

They all managed to pull it off, the USA is unique in thinking this is an impossible task. And they haven't even tried

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Every country that currently has gun control laws, at some point didn't have gun control laws and did have an armed population

Many of those countries had only an armed aristocracy, and they made those laws to keep firearms out of everyone's hands before there were hundreds of millions of armed people.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No. All these countries had crap loads of guns. UK is a good example.

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Interestingly enough, you can still purchase rifles and shotguns in the UK… you can even purchase an AR-15 or a Beretta ARX 160 legally in the UK so long as it’s chambered for .22LR and approved by the police. You just have to tell them it’s for a shooting club; not self defense.

When the UK passed their laws, it was more targeting handguns.

One of the biggest problems around guns in America is the culture. Dickbags seem to want to associate manhood with the usage of this one specific type of tool.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You can buy pretty much anything in the UK if you meet legal requirements. People have machine guns and even bloody tanks. But they have them for a good and valid reason and don't go on killing rampages.

Guns regs don't mean no guns. Gun regs mean no guns for idiots.

load more comments (50 replies)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

You can't, but in Canadian communities where firearms are more prevalent you see the same result. Mental illness and access to firearms is a huge red flag no matter where in the world you are.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Most places solve it with buy backs and slowly tightening the vice. So that people have both incentive and time to come to terms with it before it comes to a point where they would have to fight to keep them. The crazy gun nuts are actually more talk than action, despite how often they "say" they aren't.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That's another problem I have with simple baning of guns all your doing is disarming the responsible folk as what are you going to do with the people who fight back with said guns and what about the people who hide their guns or people that get guns illegally you have to remember that there are people that break the law

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Historically, old America looks very different from the current one. I look at things like our transit network being entirely train-based, and now being completely car-based. That is a HUGE change driven by demand.

The point is just that large, glacial changes over many years are by no means impossible if we’ve set it as a target and there’s motivation. Nobody ever barged into a railway company’s office and said “We’re tearing up your lines by force and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

What kind of argument are you making here? Rail lines were torn up by force. Vehicle manufacturers bought up all the public transit systems in the US and destroyed them to increase dependency on cars.

And then they lobbied hard to make it illegal to cross roads outside of crosswalks, they lobbied for highways and road expansions, and manipulated the public into believing that real freedom comes from owning a car.

None of that was truly driven by real demand, the system was manipulated to increase car dependency to the benefit of the car manufacturers.