this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
23 points (76.7% liked)

Games

16403 readers
1513 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I know I am definitely in the minority when it comes to how I feel about most popular games, but this year has honestly felt pretty meh to me. That said, I am happy to hear people are having such a good time with so many titles. I would love to feel like I'm in the same boat.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's marketing that has to make every year the best ever, but I doubt there's been a top 5 year in the last decade.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a lot of marketing, but also it's an active commercial field where people have a lot of influence on the outcome of their projects.
Given that and how it's a growing market, it wouldn't be surprising if the average number of real good games went up nearly every year.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Great AAA games seem genuinely rare now. They development cycle is shockingly long. I'd be surprised if there's even a similar number of AAA games released, even more so good ones. You can make up the difference with indie games, but release year isn't always related to when a good indie title is actually discovered.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I don't disagree. As games have higher demands, they take longer to make.
I think that experience churn is also a part of what makes it harder to see a continuous improvement in quality. In this comment area, you can see a little microcosm of what I mean. "Best year" seems to be a good year that lands during a certain age/point in your gaming experience journey.

I see that every year there are fewer games that I want to spend my time playing. I also see that I've got less time to play, and that a lot of games are just derivative, incremental refinements, sequels, or just "another game like...". I also see that a bunch of those games are being massively praised.
My take is that the games are better, I just have a raising threshold for novelty, and a game can be good and also not meet that threshold.

No matter how good your game is I've already played a puzzle platformer, so the new one won't be the same.

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

This sort of thing is very personal. IIRC 2018 was the last time we had one of these years and I was really meh on the entire year. Not bad, but it certainly didn't thrill me.

'23 has been wild though, so many games have hit with me.