this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
577 points (99.0% liked)

Work Reform

10011 readers
325 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mark your calendars

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

it seems reasonable to anticipate visitation by ACAB.

I don't know, the optics of police literally going into people's homes and pulling them out and forcing them to work doesn't seem like something the government would want, no matter what.

[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which side of government would care? The coproratocracy or the facists?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which side of government would care? The coproratocracy or the facists?

The side that wants to get reelected.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not just the optics, but the very real danger to the police themselves. This is the US. People get shot for arguing. When you know that sometime this month the police will show up at your door, you might take precautions.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Optics? Seriously? Do we live on opposite sides of the television screen?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it seems reasonable to anticipate visitation by ACAB.

I don’t know, the optics of police literally going into people’s homes and pulling them out and forcing them to work doesn’t seem like something the government would want, no matter what.

Optics? Seriously? Do we live on opposite sides of the television screen?

You really think it would be a positive optic to see on the Evening News policeman going in the house and dragging people out and forcefully driving them to work and making them work at gunpoint?

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you need a definition of the word?

A quick Google search will get you that.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now, returning, just for a moment, to the real world...

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The World is what you make of it.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listen, the system will not allow itself to collapse, instead of trying to preserve itself, simply due to a fear of outside judgment.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Listen, the system will not allow itself to collapse

Usually it gets to a point where collapse doesn't ask system for permission.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The collapse is the striking workers you believe are definitely safe from ACAB.

The system is ACAB.

Get it?

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Get it?

Yes, usually when my partner is in the mood.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're not my type.