this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
178 points (98.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43950 readers
672 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

dude, put down meth-jesus pipe and pick up anthropology of religion 101

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've spent a fair bit of time looking at the academic background of the religious tradition ranging from things like this to this thread.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you've linked the same thread twice

and i mean taking broader perspective, personally i like 10000 years long perspective

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fixed.

And yeah, I've studied that too, from pre-history to the Sumerians. I'm not really sure what's your point?

For example, there's only one extant text from antiquity explicitly describing the idea of evolution. And only one religious tradition citing that text. Which happens to also be the religious tradition claiming that an original humanity which arose spontaneously ended up creating the creator of our own cosmos, which is a copy of the one that occurred naturally.

Go ahead and show me what other religious tradition BCE was claiming things like "the cosmos and man existed from natural causes" along with "man later created God."

If you actually study the history of religion, this one existing at all with the ideas it has is weird and anachronistic as shit.