this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
371 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39046 readers
2529 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KepBen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you think I've attributed to you, I read what you wrote and shared my impression of it. If my impression is incorrect in some painfully obvious (to you) way, maybe you could take the time to explain that instead of simply calling me a liar?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there’s no such thing as a bad guy and all bad ideas are easily dismissed as “campaign rhetoric”

I don't know... like I didn't say this. This is so obviously a strawman that I don't think it warrants any more explanation, unless you can explain how what I said amounts to this.

Such a bad faith first impression doesn't encourage me to share more, thanks anyway.

[–] KepBen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, the argument you laid out is spurious and nonsensical. I did the best I could to understand it but it really does seem like something that would apply to literally any subject based on some unstated preference. Did you mean to say something other than "campaign rhetoric therefore obvious lie because it's impossible for campaigns to be honest"?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

How is it spurious and nonsensical? If you can explain that, then you have something more than a strawman, but so far you don't.

And I could reiterate what I've obviously already said, but I would just be repeating myself. I don't know where your misunderstanding roots from because you're not explaining yourself, so I don't know how to help you.