576
submitted 8 months ago by Eikichi@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Who really does hope something from the "DnT"

While the ruling against LinkedIn is a welcome development, I'm skeptical it will truly move the needle on respecting user privacy. Do Not Track has been around for years, yet sites continue ignoring it without consequence. This case may set a precedent, but it's one isolated judgment in Germany.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] otl@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago

Honestly, DNT as it's implemented in browsers today is not a sufficient solution

I've come to the same conclusion (blogged about it here https://www.srcbeat.com/2023/11/linkedin-do-not-track/) after updating myself on where it's all at.

I also think about pop-ups back in the 90s/00s. Imagine if browsers sent a "No-Popups" header (or something) back then. I doubt we would have seen any change in company behaviour. Instead, it took something like Firefox to implement pop-up blocking by default (https://lwn.net/Articles/130792/).

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
576 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

29884 readers
738 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS