this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59179 readers
2145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It has long been recognized that freedom of speech is not unlimited, and I really hope you're not trying to argue that TikTok is press.

[–] riverjig@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Oh. People are trying. I recently, will add briefly, watched a documentary on the Titanic where they had a guy from TT stating facts because his authority is that he's "The Titanic guy". Turned it off seconds after I stopped laughing.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The key line here is “abridging the freedom of speech”

I don’t like TikTok. I think it’s an actual danger to our society in how it promotes the dumbest shit and encourages dangerous antics and conspiracy theories. However, I think it’s an equally dangerous step to let the government decide to limit or remove access to a foreign social media site. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and while it might seem like a good move to limit access to TikTok specifically, that sets the precedent for removing access to other ways of communicating.

[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

while it might seem like a good move to limit access to TikTok specifically, that sets the precedent for removing access to other ways of communicating.

That precedent is well established.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

They're not limiting access. They're saying you can't install the application on a government-supplied device. Want TikTok on your personal phone - great, go ahead! Want to watch TikTok in a browser on your government device - hey, that's fine! Install a piece of software that's really aggressive in the data it collects on a government device - nope!

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it’s an actual danger to our society in how it promotes the dumbest shit and encourages dangerous antics and conspiracy theories

This is unrelated but I laughed.

This is a perfect description of Great Old Party.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think it’s an actual danger to our society in how it promotes the dumbest shit and encourages dangerous antics and conspiracy theories.

Now for a serious post, I'll gladly sacrifice TikTok and a goat if that's it takes to kill Google, META and the others.