this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
348 points (92.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

29590 readers
1736 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Be good to others - no bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia
  6. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes and in the past games used to not have loot boxes and subscriptions.

Your experience in the past does not represent an accurate view of the future of games.

You might have had fun with free shit but that’s not the case for everyone and every game. Especially moving forward with how games are developed nowadays. You are projecting your “good” experience onto many players that didn’t.

If it’s only got a playerbase because it’s giving free shit to attract players for whales then that game is a fucking scam.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Your experience in the past does not represent an accurate view of the future of games.

I never said it did. You're the one predicting the future of gaming, while ignoring things in the present that call into question your assumptions. So I suggest that your hypothetical probably doesn't represent the future either.

You are projecting your “good” experience onto many players that didn’t.

Lol all I did was point out that your claims of facts are not true, and that your prediction about the future ignores important things about the model now. In fact I very explicitly said "for me." So this claim I was suggesting it's the same for everyone is kind of ridiculous. Seems like your MO is ignoring what was said in favor of what you want to be true.