this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
37 points (95.1% liked)
Astronomy
5232 readers
17 users here now
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My understanding is that "gravitational waves" are mechanical waves, like water, not "quantum waves" like light.
This article seems to confuse what wave particle duality means:
When it comes to duality it's the particles that exhibit wave-like properties individually.
Wave/Particle duality of quantum objects (quanta) is a bit like bicycle/car duality when looking at motorcycles. Light isn't a wave or a particle, but it has properties of both. Motorcycles aren't pedal-powered bikes or cars, but have properties of both.
There are no particles, just quanta.
Right - that's what I'm saying. But this article seems to think that if you make a bicycle out of cars then you have a motorcycle.. Unless I'm not understanding it.
AFAIK gravity waves are ripples in actual space (mechanical waves) - not a property of "gravitons".
Gravity waves are completely different from gravitational waves.
https://coco1453.wordpress.com/home/gravity-related-terms/
Gravitational waves are not 'mechanical waves'. It is thought that gravitational radiation is a lot like electromagnetic radiation. Therefore gravitational waves might work like light waves, and have a particle like light does.
Ah! Thanks! I wasn't aware there was a difference!
Common mistake