this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
1694 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

59111 readers
3249 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PineapplePartisan@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago (23 children)

They gave up all their personal data to see a crappy algo-driven social media site. Meta still considers this a win.

[–] master5o1@lemmy.nz 84 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What new personal information did meta get from Instagram users enabling threads?

[–] saegiru@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The real answer is nothing, assuming they already had an Instagram account. People are all up in arms, but the majority of 'signups' were just people clicking the activation button as opposed to creating a new account.

That said, I currently will praise anything that takes more users away from Twitter. Lesser of two evils and all that.

[–] leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not that I disagree much, but... what a world we live in where Meta is the lesser of two evils...

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, that’s enough internet for today, day drinking anyone?

[–] Doom_Cough@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Day dosing more like it.

[–] Mikelius@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d argue Meta takes the cake just with Cambridge Analytica in terms of damage. Let alone all the other shit. But yeah, choose between ebola and the black plague…

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 7 points 1 year ago

Plus, Elon is more likely to run Twitter into the ground than Zuck is Meta, so that alone makes Meta the bigger threat.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I agree, it’s amazing. Musk has been such a dumbfuck that he has managed to make Mark Zuckerberg look good by comparison.

[–] Meltbox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As LTT said. Threads is the result of the Zuck flicking his tongue out and tasting blood.

But I mean we (society, not me, miss me with that) are still clearly subscribing to a social media site run by the lizard people and calling it an improvement.

Which says a lot.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have to have blood to be a lizard. That man is as organic as my Playstation

[–] Bozicus@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And, unless your Playstation is broken, less fun.

...wait, scratch, that, even if your Playstation is broken, he's less fun.

[–] jdsquared@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Zuck is not a lesser evil. He's the same evil. And Jeffrey bezos this week is having a laugh because nobody's paying attention to him at the moment.

[–] AnotherPerson@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to assume not all new users were Instagram users.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure all new users are required to have an Instagram? I know for sure the two are linked. No deleting Threads without deleting your Insta.

[–] andrr_464@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Health history and fitness status

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instagram doesn't already collect that?

[–] andrr_464@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That surprises me. I assumed they took everything they could.

load more comments (18 replies)