I clumsily dropped one in the store. I was in full cringe, waiting for it to shatter, but instead it bounced around a bit, completely unharmed.
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
38 points (97.5% liked)
Comradeship // Freechat
2168 readers
62 users here now
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I remember hearing that they made an almost unbreakable glass, but the capitalists ditched it after reunification, having no use for something that can only profited off of once. Could this be the infamous glass? Probably not, but I can pretend.
Superfest! I have a Superfest beer mug actually. They aren't absolutely unbreakable if you were trying, but they are impervious to pretty much any accidental damage.
The capitalist story was that it was an "innovation of necessity" because people couldn't afford "normal" glasses. In reality it was just part of the GDR's philosophy of making the best products they could as locally as possible while reducing waste. They were thin and lightweight but extremely durable. The science involved in making them is a fun read.
As you might suspect, the idea of an affordable glass that didn't need to be replaced didn't sell well in capitalist circles and the technology was abandoned after reunification and the plant dismantled to make sure no competitors tried to use it.
It's one of my go-to examples anytime someone tries to bring up that capitalism fosters innovation, when in reality it does exactly the opposite.
EDIT: It doesn't look like Superfest specifically, but I imagine there were similar design principles in play.