this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
877 points (98.8% liked)

Memes

45280 readers
2204 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
877
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by EherVielleicht@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 25 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Why didn't Superman just grab the child and fly away?

[–] crawley@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Superman had no idea there was child there, he just wanted to fuck up a train.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's the trolley problem. Picking up a kid in time to beat a speeding train would just snap his little neck. Stopping a speeding train to save the little boy would most likely kill anyone on board.

This scenario indicates superman would rather kill a train full of people, rather than having witnesses see him sit idle as a child removes himself from the gene pool.

My hypothesis is that this is the child of Lex Luther, or possibly a clone. He's literally playing on train train tracks, baiting super man into a win-less scenario via the trolley problem. It's the perfect scheme to slowly make him question the consequences of all his actions and eventually his entire purpose.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He was feeling a bit Hancock that day.

[–] EherVielleicht@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Where is my Bourbon?

[–] GrievingWidow420@feddit.it 3 points 10 months ago

The train was carrying electric sharing kick scooters to be deployed into metropolis and Superman wasn't about to let it happen

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

Because it's an Amtrak.