this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
719 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
130 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reveal came as SAG-AFTRA actors confirmed they were going on strike.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because an AI is created by humans. If an AI can create art, that art is ultimately created by humans

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if you teach someone to paint all their art is created by you?

Don't think that stands up really.

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I teach a neural network to draw with only my picture, the art is mine and of all people who contributed to creating the AI technology, including theory, software, hardware (because each of them contribute to the final result as much as the training data - even more in reality)...

If I teach someone to draw, and I am the only input he's ever had in his life, art is his, but I contributed to it.

Computers are not people

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

People aren't anything special. We are essentially pattern recognising computers. Our hardware is just very different.

[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mark Twain was created by other humans… but his grand parents aren’t famous.

I see no reason the thousands of people who work on an AI will be any more famous than the thousands of non-acting artists who currently work on a movie.

Maybe directors (or the AI prompt writer) becomes more famous… but even that will self-automate pretty quickly

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mark twain was created by natural precesses such as evolution, by randomness and by education/environment. It is a different thing.

AI is tha peak product of the collaboration of many human beings across generations. Scientists, engineers, artists, common people, all have "worked" together to generate an amazing, extraordinary, artificial thing.

If such things can create art, that art is made by everyone, just like honey is the final product of the whole colony of bees.

We simply need to change our perspective on fame. No one deserves fame, we all deserve to be celebrated