this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Pokémon

3157 readers
16 users here now

The Lemmy community for all things Pokémon!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I recently got Pokemon Home and let me just say I love the continuity it provides. Not only can I play with nostalgic teams, but the trade's on offer are the most busted things Ive seen in a long while. Requesting a lv 91-100 Pharaoh/La Reine trim Furfrou for a Kubfu? Sure that sucks, as there is no way to train one in the current gen, requiring a Pokemon bank enabled DS or a literal trip to another country, but its a legendary, so I kinda get it. But all that for a lv 5 Alolan Rattata? I feel like I'm back in the middle-school cafeteria getting fucked on trades again. Thanks Pokemon Home.

"* * * *" 4/5 stars. it loses a point because i haven't figured out how to get my box to actually be sorted by National Dex order for real and not just a search filter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why are thes impossible trades even allowed. Ive seen so many requests for lv 1 -10 final evos like darapult and typhlosion. You would think the system would recogniz that as impossible and deny the post

[–] Louise@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Probably the fact that Go constantly updates and can have oddly level Pokémon, so one day they all technically could be possible, but aren't now.

Let's Go mons who can never enter Let's Go like Galar Ponyta though... no idea.

[–] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who even plays Go anymore. I havent seen anyone walking around tapping balls since 2017-18 and im near a city so i would imagine stops are relitively plentiful

[–] Hamano@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I start playing the game again a week ago. In a mid size city in France, gyms got conquered by a new team almost everyday (in the inner city thought).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)