this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
221 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59211 readers
3499 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

so basically you're getting a surveillance device shipped straight to your living room.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why would anyone want this? It's free, so it's obviously not even going to be a good quality TV.

There are no upsides to this.

[–] db2@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's worse than that. If the concept of the book 1984 were a television this would be it.

[–] nymwit@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

“What Orwell failed to predict is that we’d buy the cameras ourselves, and that our biggest fear would be that nobody was watching.”

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

All we need is to get a Peloton so our exercise can be monitored too.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

The upside seems pretty clear? It's a free 55" TV. A lot of people won't care that it's not as good as other TVs.

[–] Huxston@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re just not poor enough yet. They’ll keep inflating us into poverty until this becomes everybody’s best option

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Low income folks who can't afford an alternative.

[–] ritswd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, if I was broke, I’d consider it. If you can afford anything else, then yeah, take that something else. But not everybody can afford stuff.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can buy good quality TVs that are maybe 2-3 years old in sales or secondhand which would be much better than this, and no need for ads.

I've seen people get an LG C1 for like $100 secondhand and there's nothing wrong with it. You don't have to spend close to or upwards of 1,000 on a TV.

[–] ritswd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Somebody posted another comment with the exact same idea, and I think y’all are under-estimating the amount of people who live under the poverty line (11%/~4M people in the US for instance), and the even larger amount of people who live below a living wage, and therefore all have zero buying power for consumer discretionary items, let alone having $100 to spend.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I tried to sign up just now but it’s US only. I don’t have a TV at all, I can’t afford one. I’d love this.