this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
9 points (90.9% liked)

United Kingdom

4038 readers
265 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I don't understand this. How does the UK government voting for a ceasefire actually achieve anything? They're not going to honour a vote we made.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We can't affect their policy directly, but as close allies that supply them with weapons, we're uniquely suited to demand a ceasefire. Our leverage is that we would stop providing them with weapons and political cover to continue their genocide. We could even adopt sanctions, or work with the Hague to have Netanyahu tried for war crimes.

[–] tal 4 points 10 months ago

There's sometimes a disconnect between what's politically advantageous and what's actual policy. If it's popular for an MP to vote for a ceasefire....shrugs

We do nonbinding resolutions in Congress all the time. They don't actually have an effect on policy, but they make some people happy, so...

[–] cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Sometimes foreign policy involves stating a position, even if we can't unilaterally make it happen. Macron has done this, which paved the way for other leaders to do it as well.

If Starmer wants to be prime minister, he has to realise that he will eventually have to take positions on world events. In my opinion, just following America has been disastrous for us, and I'd like us to change that.