Programming

16983 readers

509 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

I wrote a program for my boss. How legal is to to write the program again and make it FOSS? (lemm.ee)

submitted 10 months ago by DroneRights@lemm.ee to c/programming@programming.dev

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I told my boss I had an idea for a program that could improve efficiency across much of the business, and he let me build it on company time. In the long term, he wanted to be able to sell it to other companies. However, the program never got implemented due to personnel mismanagement, and I'd rather be able to post it on my github under a free licence so I can use it as a resume item, and at least someone would have the chance to actually use it. It's all still in my head, and I could write it again if I wanted. If I do, is it illegal to publish it? What if I write it in a different language? Do I need to change the variable names? I did plenty of research and planning on company time to build it, and it's not like I can research it again, it's all still in my head.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Going to such lengths suggests this is morally the wrong thing to do.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

"Make those parts pluggable/replaceable which would be a good design anyways".

Following best practices = Morally Wrong?
Sure, fren, whatever you say.

The only reason OP might not have done it this way in the first place would have been to save the company worrying about licensing, or getting shitty with OP about not using enough orignal/proprietary code to ensure lock-in with future clients ... is THAT somehow morally superior in your book?

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago

I just mean that the amount of subterfuge that's been suggested in this thread suggests these people feel that something's wrong. You don't normally have to go to such lengths to hide your identity on GitHub.

Let's be honest, deciding later that code they wrote for someone should be repurposed behind their back is rather underhanded. And making it open source rather than spinning their own company doesn't make it more palatable.

[–] Blackthorn@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

I'd say it suggests it's "legally" the wrong thing to do.