this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
40 points (97.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8250 readers
469 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
40
Battleborn, the abandoned Gearbox FPS that was shut down two years ago, is somehow back again (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 10 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

TLDR: The number of people in a group has nothing to do with whether they should be treated kindly. Yet by bringing it up in reply to my call for decency, you implied that it does. As if, if the people affected are few enough, respect is unneccessary.

Even if the only people who care are the modders themselves, it's still uncool to shit on them. ALL my comment does, is tell someone off for putting down whatever fanbase remains for a game that's already dead. That you framed a reply to that in a "no, but" suggests you thought they had good reason to be rude.

What is there to add? You're not correcting anything. There is no "but" here, yet by using that word you undermine whatever precedes it. I wasn't looking to inform, but to encourage decency. Walking in with an acchually in this way and calling attention to the number of fans is irrelevant at best, and at worst, undermines my attempt to call for cordial behaviour.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There was no implication of mistreatment. That's you putting intent and meaning into words that I neither said nor implied.

Whatever argument you're trying to have, you can have it by yourself.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Clearly you didn't mean it, now that you've made further comments, but when have words only ever carried the intended effect?

If someone says "let's be cool to each other" and you reply with "yes, but there's only three of them" then it looks like you're saying that being decent is only warranted for large numbers.

Your wording makes your agreement conditional, in a way it shouldn't be, and didn't even intend.