this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
49 points (98.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39365 readers
478 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Synapse and Dendrite relicensed to AGPLv3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is pretty bad in terms of software freedom. However I see why they did it.

What needs to happen is that Matrix need to focus stability and user friendliness. Right now no major group or company wants it because its a mess

[–] vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Right now no major group or company wants it
most people beyond the tech field [don't] know what Matrix is

Wrong

Amongst others...

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why you think this is bad for software freedom?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It allows for proprietary use of a FOSS. Its true that almost all of the contributions are from element but that doesn't make it right.

Element is in trouble and they are trying to stay afloat

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

Quite the opposite. Synapse was licenced under Apache licence, which allowed everybody to make proprietary fork.

Now only Element can do proprietary fork, as they are the copyright owners and owner of the work can relicence the software as they want.

The CLA that Element require to contribute changes to their Synapse version is the controversial thing. Because if you contribute, the lines of code you made are your copyright, so if Element takes at least one community contribution the would be locked to AGPL. What CLA does is that you sign off those rights.